Raw Data (I'm not sure what is causing the extra space...apologies):
Win 95 | 55 MB |
Win NT | 110 MB |
Win 2000 | 650 MB |
Win XP | 1500 MB |
2003 server | 2500 MB |
Windows Vista | 15000 MB |
Random musings, funny stories and pictures, and anything else that I am thinking about at the moment...
Win 95 | 55 MB |
Win NT | 110 MB |
Win 2000 | 650 MB |
Win XP | 1500 MB |
2003 server | 2500 MB |
Windows Vista | 15000 MB |
2 comments:
But why? Is it going to be so much better? Why is it so much bigger?
I was wondering the same thing. I'm no Mac-Head, but I'm sure we'd agree MacOS is more stable than anything Bill Gates has given us since he moved out of parent's garage. It uses 3-4 GB of space.
I'm told Linux uses about 500MB to 1GB depending on options.
That leads to the question - are more the increased requirements good or bad?
Post a Comment